$2.51 USD

Market Cap: $3,388,500

Volume: $1,174,680

Learn More

Interpersonal Relations


As Pied Piper’s Head of Business Development, I wear many hats. (Figuratively, I mean — wearing a hat indoors is a little fresh for my taste.) Most recently, however, my head has been occupied by one chapeau in particular: interpersonal relations.

The first challenge arose when Dinesh and Gilfoyle tested the alpha of our new app, and a merge error left each one’s data on the other’s phone. I thought we’d all just have a good laugh about it — Dinesh would tease Gilfoyle for buying tickets to a Satanist film festival; Gilfoyle would mock Dinesh for his Notes file “Non-Threatening Pickup Lines”; I’d lightly rib them both, very much included in the fun — but things quickly escalated into a standoff. The entire ordeal tested just about every non-violent conflict resolution tactic I learned at last year’s conference in Sacramento, but in the end brute force prevailed and the phones were destroyed. At least this gives me a scenario to role play at the next conference!

On top of that, Richard came to me with an urgent romantic crisis. Details of his sexual escapade are best kept between him and myself, the closest of confidants, but suffice it to say he needed to cut ties and maintain his “ramblin’ man” status. We brainstormed a graceful exit strategy, although I’m sure it will still take time for the young lady to move on. After all, Richard has such a remarkable mind, but it is just one among many remarkable organs, like his heart.

After these trying journeys across the waves of human emotion, I think it’s time for another Redfin holiday. There’s a beautiful Colonial that I’m sure will sell fast, and I want to spend some time imagining its rat-free charms before the listing is taken down!

Comments (11)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. I love this show. And i follow all of the things related to Silicon Valley. My favorite is Gilfoyle. But all of the characters (Gilfoyle, erlich, dinesh, richard, gavin, jin, jared, Russ, and others) are awesome and hilarious. Love the show. I myself, a coder. ^_^

  2. So season finale double the Wiseman score with a 3D file that cut it and half at least…. congratulations I believe it’s a homerun and to top it off with a panic attack at the end beautiful touch period that’s it probably the exact same reaction I would have. I hope to be there soon Richard Hendricks myself now I’ll wait for a cold war to pass before the next season but we all do what we have to congratulations To Who It May Concern on Silicon Valley keep them coming boys!!

  3. I am currently 14 minutes into the season finale of the latest season out or available… an I think that you should know Jared aka whoever is concerned lol.. the fact that I would take the time to even write says what my Sunday consists of well tbh HBO specials & I guess that’s the point here I want to say that watching Silicon Valley it makes me laugh I am rooting for a Pied Piper has I’m sure most of the world is and you guys have done a great job of making it look like they’re going to fail. And if that happens in the end that would definitely be something that would be unexpected. I think it’s kinda cool that the show has gone as far as to have a Pied Piper website for real and a Hooli one also.. lol props to the show I think that all the young people in the world today can watch Silicon Valley an realize you don’t have to be 40 50 60 years old to be a CEO of a company with shark tank out there and other companies like that entrepreneurs ready to back reasonable companies that’s fantastic. I’m a 39 year old guy from Maine who went to school for it back in 2001 and ended up defaulting on my loans and dropping out 4 excuses that aren’t excusable good now I am currently working to pay those back and go back to school for mobile development and web design can I cut it part of that decision believe it or not to watch the show my grandfather used to drill in my head constantly as I was born in 77 so when I was between the ages of 6 and 12 primarily he would drill into my head that every job that was operated by humans he believe it’s at this point in life would primarily be taken over by technology of course I believe that air is still coming so with a show like yours again I think it just shows that you don’t have to be in your upper late life to be successful until props you cross to the show and to whoever is listening to this I’m sorry reading this. Continue with the respectable comedic show that you have going and you have a home run!
    Respectfully & wildly entertained,
    Derek Long

    1. So I apologize I talked out the entire message and I did not proofread it see you can see my errors for example air should be era period And there’s several others and I apologize I should have proof read it period but I believe you get the point I was trying to make so have a great day Rock on the show is great!!!

      1. Higher one more quick comments I’m currently at the point in the finale where they are writing d2f and different things on a whiteboard and I am laughing my ass off congrats Gents as I believe Ehrlich would say.

      2. I don’t know if the last one went through but I’m currently at the finale where they are writing on a whiteboard about d2f you know what I’m talking about and I am LMAO congrats Gents says I believe Ehrlich would say!

Problem 1:

Single Points of Failure

Libraries are vulnerable to losing their collection because all of their books are contained at a single location. Say, for instance, that there was a fire, or a flood, or a vandal defaced John James Audubon’s masterpiece Birds of America by giving all the Warblers human genitalia. Even worse, if the vandal recruited bird haters from other neighborhoods and got ahold of all the copies of the book in existence, it could be lost crude doodles forever. It would be a tragedy on par with the destruction of the Library of Alexandria.

The Problem

Because Birds of America is centralized in one public location, it’s susceptible to permanent deletion. The same goes for content on the Internet — storing all your family photos on a single account in a cloud service? They could all be wiped away if someone hacked your account or corrupted the host servers.

The Solution

Our solution: In our decentralized library, we would duplicate and distribute multiple copies of Birds of America to your neighbors — if you need a copy, you would just go to your neighbor’s house. As our Pipernet town of mobile devices grows, so do the number of neighbors who might have a copy of your book. And the more potential copies there are available, the more secure the book is.

That’s what our new internet will allow you to do too: spread your personal files on devices across the world, so they’re completely safe from bad actors manipulating or deleting them.


All copies of your files in a well-known, hackable location = RISKY!

Files copied and distributed to multiple locations = SAFE!

Problem 2:

No Privacy

In order to check out books, you must have a library card — an ID that links back to your real world identity. That library card reveals all the books you’ve ever checked out, where you returned them, and whether they were returned on time.

The Problem

The tech titans collect data profiles on us too, and theirs are far more comprehensive. They amass thousands of personal data points by tracking our activities in both the online and physical worlds.

Users don’t own or control their own data, so it can be used against them. Take, for instance, Richard’s lawyer Pete Monahan, who had his probation revoked when the state retrieved his library records. Which was… probably a good idea. But for this metaphor’s purposes: bad that they can access that information!

On the web, our data profile is far more detailed, the laws around privacy even looser, and more freedoms are at stake. For example, what if Hooli sold your search data to an insurance company who then denied you coverage because you’ve HooliSearch-ed “kindest Palo Alto based Cardiologist” a few too many times?

The Solution

Replace library cards with anonymous identification cards which are impossible to connect to your real world identity. Instead of using a library card (linked to your name, address, etc.) to check out books, you would swipe a nondescript card (containing no personal details). Your activity would be tracked to keep the system stable, but your identity would not be siphoned and sold. I, for example, would no longer check out books as "Donald Dunn," but rather the nom de guerre "h3w0vbk37vpm."

That’s what our new internet will allow you to do too: use its apps and services without compromising your privacy.


Trading your identity and data for online services = RISKY!

Using services anonymously so nobody can target you = SAFE!

Problem 3:

Censorship and Manipulation

Because a town’s library is run by a small group of administrators, they could theoretically decide what books are available to its people. They could even decide to ban Birds of America, depriving young birders of Audubon’s elegant illustrations, pored over page by page under a government-issued blanket after lights out, giving you hope that even a slender-framed, shivering boy could grow to be as majestic as a Hooded Merganser.

The Problem

On the internet, multinational corporations can screen content, or even “adapt” their services to fit the local government’s requests. In both libraries and on the Web, we’re susceptible to data being censored or manipulated by intermediaries.

The Solution

A peer-to-peer lending system backed up by a fully public ledger, allowing you to send and receive books freely to anybody in the world without worrying about censorship or interference. Want to add Catcher in the Rye, Fahrenheit 451, or your controversial essay on Audubon’s coloring techniques? No problem, even if the town surrounded you with pitchforks to ban them, these vital texts would be available to share neighbor to neighbor, impossible to delete.

That’s what our new internet will allow you to do too: exchange messages and files directly with their intended receiver, disperse ideas and information free from threats of censorship.


Pushing all transactions through a central authority = OPPRESSIVE!

Establishing a peer to peer exchange system based on an immutable public ledger = FREE!

to top